Wednesday, February 13, 2008

We cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow

You know how some people can feel deep within their bosom the first waves of a surge of nascent born again Christianity or the stirring of some other life-changing need? I think I'm very close to beginning to think about becoming a Civil War buff. Mind you, I'm not about to start recreating famous battles or anything but a lifelong fascination with the photography of Matthew Brady, Alexander Gardner and others who dragged their cameras to the battlefield during The War Between the States is starting to morph into the desire to know more. Names, dates, battles, aftermaths. I've done this sort of thing before, making myself some years ago an expert on the Salem hysteria. I have volume after volume on the subject and personal notebooks filled with the names of the executed... so obviously this kind of mania is within me. Now, I haven't gone and done anything foolish... yet... but I suspect these wiggly inclinations are about to get the better of me.

I've always found those old photographs from this era to be surpassingly eerie. Sure, all the rubbery dead bodies in the frame probably have a lot to do with that but even more than the carnage it's the coldness and the presence of the woods in the background and the patchwork look of the soldiers' uniforms, which amount to little more than their own clothes to which has been added a cap with a military emblem, a satchel with a military buckle, or a musket. Dirty, bearded and starved, these poor bastards look like concentration camp internees more than terra stamping commandos. Those photographs have a power over me and prompted me to read the Civil War fiction of Ambrose Bierce. I find all of this unbelievably creepy and irresistible.

All of this is coming to a head now with the publication of a couple of books about the Civil War dead, about the (then) unfathomable volume of dead bodies that the Civil War generated and what had to be done about them. I'm particularly interested in Harvard President Drew Gilpin Faust's This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War (Knopf, 2008), which suggests that the way in which our country responded to the dead weight of so many war casualties actually defined America as we know it now. I quote from Gilpin's introduction:

Bodies were in important ways the measure of the war–of its achievements and its impact; and indeed, bodies became highly visible in Civil War America. Commanders compared their own and enemy casualties as evidence of military success or failure. Soldiers struggled for the words to describe mangled corpses strewn across battlefields; families contemplated the significance of newspaper lists of wounds: "slightly, in the shoulder," "severely, in the groin," "mortally, in the breast." They nursed the dying and buried their remains. Letters and reports from the front rendered the physicality of injuries and death all but unavoidable. For the first time civilians directly confronted the reality of battlefield death rendered by the new art of photography. They found themselves transfixed by the paradoxically lifelike renderings of the slain of Antietam that Mathew Brady exhibited in his studio on Broadway. If Brady "has not brought bodies and laid them in our dooryards and along the streets, he has done something very like it," wrote the New York Times.

This new prominence of bodies overwhelmingly depicted their destruction and deformation, inevitably raising the question of how they related to the persons who had once inhabited them. In the aftermath of battle survivors often shoveled corpses into pits as they would dispose of animals–"in bunches, just like dead chickens," one observer noted–dehumanizing both the living and the dead through their disregard. In Civil War death the distinction between men and animals threatened to disappear, just as it was simultaneously eroding in the doctrines of nineteenth-century science.

I mean no pun, but it sounds like there's a lot of meat here. It would be interesting to find out that a lifelong interest in morbid subjects on my part is actually part and parcel of a perfectly American legacy.

9 comments:

K. said...

For an interesting take on Civil War photographs, see John Huddleston's Killing Ground: Photographs of the Civil War and the Changing American Landscape. Huddleston visited the sites depicted in Civil War photographs, took contemporary pictures, then displayed them side-by-side. For example. a photo of the Union defensive line at the Battle of Nashville is paired with a contemporary photo of a KFC franchise near the same place, along with the notation that there were 7,407 American casualties in the battle.

TheDevilSatan.com said...

A wonderfully dark blog, please share some more.

The Devil Satan

Corpse On Pumpkin said...

This is an incredibly informative blog entry composed around the idea of personal interest. I took a pen to jot down the names of photographers you mentioned. On my next visit to a bookstore I plan to pick something up with something I can hold that shows something like this and means something.

CRwM said...

Republic of Suffering is great. I also recommend Patriotic Gore which was an earlier study of the impact on of the war on literature, and the larger culture by extension. The Metaphysical Club explores some of the same ground too - it posits that some of America's most notable homegrown philosophical school, Pragmatism, was a product of the waste and death of the war.

That might be more than choose to bite off. But it's all interesting.

Dracenea said...

I think what gets me most is wondering what happened on that patch of ground before the body laid there and what happened after. If you think about it, we all have walked where a dead body lay at some point or another.

Judge Lucre said...

Nice. The most morbid civil war experience was visiting Antietam Creek that time of year that they have a bagged candle display over the battlefield representing each person who died. Candles all the way to the horizon. The power of it is horrific. Regards, Lucre
http://www.churchofmammon.com

michaeldoubrava said...

Its an interesting fact to note that the photographer carefully arranged this scene to create a more visually appealing composition.

Myna said...

You articulate well.

I once read that Matthew Brady's greatest frustration in photographing Abraham Lincoln was that he could never capture the man's true expression for posterity. Apparently, Lincoln had one of the most animated faces Brady had ever seen.

The gruesome aspect of the battlefield casualty images, is that the dead were re-positioned per the photographer's artistic stance on the horrors of the battlefield. The melodrama of the Victorian era can never be underestimated.

What I came initially to say, is that your comment in regard to the death of Susan Atkins, on Killer Kittens blogspot, was the most deeply insightful response as ever could be written. It would serve well as an epitaph to end the script of such a senseless and tragic drama. Often, compassion is mistaken as sentiment, and yet at its' essential core, it is simply and profoundly humane.

Peace~

Myna said...

I see the re-positioning of the battle dead has already been mentioned. Apologies for the redundancy.

Peace~